GMD cover
Executive editors: David Ham, Juan Antonio Añel, Astrid Kerkweg, Min-Hui Lo, Richard Neale, Rolf Sander & Paul Ullrich
eISSN: 1991-9603

Geoscientific Model Development (GMD) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and public discussion of the description, development, and evaluation of numerical models of the Earth system and its components. The following manuscript types can be considered for peer-reviewed publication:

  • geoscientific model descriptions, from statistical models to box models to GCMs;
  • development and technical papers, describing developments such as new parameterizations or technical aspects of running models such as the reproducibility of results;
  • new methods for assessment of models, including work on developing new metrics for assessing model performance and novel ways of comparing model results with observational data;
  • papers describing new standard experiments for assessing model performance or novel ways of comparing model results with observational data;
  • model experiment descriptions, including experimental details and project protocols;
  • full evaluations of previously published models.

More details can be found in manuscript types and the journal editorial (compiled by the executive editors).

"I believe that the time is ripe for significantly better documentation of programs, and that we can best achieve this by considering programs to be works of literature." (Donald E. Knuth, Literate Programming, 1984)
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful." (George E. P. Box, Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building, 1979)

Journal metrics

GMD is indexed in the Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, etc. We refrain from displaying the journal metrics prominently on the landing page since citation metrics used in isolation do not describe importance, impact, or quality of a journal. However, these metrics can be found on the journal metrics page.

Highlight articles

23 Sep 2026
The North American CORDEX-CMIP6 WRF evaluation run: comparing historical simulations from 25 km to convection-permitting scales
Jacob Stuivenvolt-Allen, Trude Eidhammer, Rachel McCrary, Melissa Bukovsky, Stefan Rahimi, Hsin-I Chang, and Seth McGinnis
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 8995–9017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8995-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8995-2026, 2026
Short summary Editorial statement
18 Sep 2026
The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP7
Paulo Ceppi, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Mark D. Zelinka, Timothy Andrews, Florent Brient, Robin Chadwick, An-Zhuo Dai, Jonathan M. Gregory, Yen-Ting Hwang, Sarah M. Kang, Jennifer E. Kay, Thorsten Mauritsen, Tomoo Ogura, George Tselioudis, Masahiro Watanabe, Mark J. Webb, and Allison A. Wing
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 8693–8708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8693-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8693-2026, 2026
Short summary Editorial statement
11 Sep 2026
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) contribution to CMIP7 – description of new experimental protocols and preliminary results
Daniele Visioni, Alan Robock, Alistair Duffey, Matthew Henry, Haruki Hirasawa, Walker Raymond Lee, Cindy Wang, Kelsey Roberts, Shingo Watanabe, Michelle Simões Reboita, Masahiro Sugiyama, Ben Kravitz, Jim Haywood, Simone Tilmes, Frédéric K. Bonou, Jack Chen, Timofei Sukhodolov, Sandro Vattioni, Andrin Jörimann, Diego Villanueva, Ryan Vella, Paul Farron, Ewa Bednarz, Ulrike Niemeier, Colleen Golja, and Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 8469–8499, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8469-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8469-2026, 2026
Short summary Editorial statement
13 Aug 2026
Rapid Evaluation Framework for the CMIP7 Assessment Fast Track
Forrest M. Hoffman, Birgit Hassler, Ranjini Swaminathan, Jared Lewis, Bouwe Andela, Nathan Collier, Dóra Hegedűs, Jiwoo Lee, Charlotte Pascoe, Mika Pflüger, Martina Stockhause, Paul Ullrich, Min Xu, Lisa Bock, Felicity Chun, Bettina K. Gier, Douglas I. Kelley, Axel Lauer, Julien Lenhardt, Manuel Schlund, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Katja Weigel, Ed Blockley, Rebecca Beadling, Romain Beucher, Demiso D. Dugassa, Valerio Lembo, Jianhua Lu, Swen Brands, Jerry Tjiputra, Elizaveta Malinina, Brian Medeiros, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jeremy Walton, Phil Kershaw, André Lanfer Marquez, Malcolm J. Roberts, Eleanor O'Rourke, Beth Dingley, Briony Turner, Helene Hewitt, and John P. Dunne
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 7415–7455, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7415-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7415-2026, 2026
Short summary Editorial statement
29 Jul 2026
A global high-resolution hydrological model to simulate the dynamics of surface liquid reservoirs: application on Mars
Alexandre Gauvain, François Forget, Martin Turbet, Jean-Baptiste Clément, Lucas Lange, and Romain Vandemeulebrouck
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 6909–6940, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6909-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6909-2026, 2026
Short summary Editorial statement

Recent papers

11 Nov 2026
PLSTM-Reg v1.0: a regional physics-encoded LSTM model for simulating reservoir operations without site-specific training
Bin Yu, Yanan Chen, and Yi Zheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 10699–10717, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10699-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10699-2026, 2026
Short summary
11 Nov 2026
A hybrid physics–ML framework for integrating groundwater dynamics into land surface modeling: a ParFlow-based demonstration in headwater watersheds of the Pearl River Basin, China
Chen Yang, Hui Huang, Zeyu Tang, Yongjiu Dai, and Xiaobin Chang
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 10719–10734, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10719-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10719-2026, 2026
Short summary
11 Nov 2026
The sparse matrix-based atmospheric moisture tracking (SMAT) model v1.0 for efficient diagnosis of global climatological moisture source–sink relationships
Yufeng Shan, Peng Qian, Kun Yang, Jiangfeng Wei, Dongdong Qiu, Fangyu Liu, and Jun Ge
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5716,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5716, 2026
Preprint under review for GMD (discussion: open, 0 comments)
Short summary
10 Nov 2026
Evaluating extreme precipitation forecasts: a threshold-weighted, spatial verification approach for comparing an AI weather prediction model against a high-resolution NWP model
Nicholas Loveday and Tracy Hertneky
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 10651–10667, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10651-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10651-2026, 2026
Short summary
10 Nov 2026
Assessing cloud representation in two microphysics schemes of MPAS–Atmosphere model (version 8.2.2) over the Maritime Continent with Himawari-9 AHI observations
Xuewei Zhang, Lipeng Jiang, Zhiquan Liu, Tao Sun, Wei Wang, and I.-Han Chen
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 10625–10650, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10625-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10625-2026, 2026
Short summary

News

11 Nov 2026 Getting too many editor calls?

You can now customize how you receive editor calls. Head over to "My settings" to choose between instant notifications for each manuscript or a single weekly summary of unassigned papers in your field. You can also log any upcoming absences there; if an executive editor tries to assign you a manuscript while you are away, they will automatically see that you are out.

11 Nov 2026 Getting too many editor calls?

You can now customize how you receive editor calls. Head over to "My settings" to choose between instant notifications for each manuscript or a single weekly summary of unassigned papers in your field. You can also log any upcoming absences there; if an executive editor tries to assign you a manuscript while you are away, they will automatically see that you are out.

04 Nov 2026 New co-review option in GMD

GMD now offers a co-review option for referees. Please read more.

04 Nov 2026 New co-review option in GMD

GMD now offers a co-review option for referees. Please read more.

30 Jul 2026 RIME-X v1.0: combining simple climate models, Earth system models, and climate impact models into a unified statistical emulator for regional climate indicators

The authors study how regional climate and climate impact indicators may respond to different emissions scenarios. Their possible outcomes are shaped by uncertainties in future emissions, global warming, regional effects of global warming, and the chaotic climate system. Please read more.

30 Jul 2026 RIME-X v1.0: combining simple climate models, Earth system models, and climate impact models into a unified statistical emulator for regional climate indicators

The authors study how regional climate and climate impact indicators may respond to different emissions scenarios. Their possible outcomes are shaped by uncertainties in future emissions, global warming, regional effects of global warming, and the chaotic climate system. Please read more.

Notice on APC invoices

In accordance with current European restrictions, Copernicus Publications does not step into business relations with and issue APC invoices (articles processing charges) to Russian and Belarusian institutions. The peer-review process and scientific exchange of our journals including preprint posting is not affected. However, these restrictions require that the first contact (contractual partner of Copernicus) has an affiliation and invoice address outside Russia or Belarus.